About FrameFolio
A review site that judges portfolio builders the way a gallery judges a hang.
FrameFolio reviews portfolio website builders for people whose work has to be looked at: photographers, artists, illustrators, designers, models, actors, writers, filmmakers. It is written as a set of wall labels — short, exact, and more interested in what a platform does to your work than in how many templates it ships.
The question we ask
Every review here answers one thing: does the work survive the template? A builder can have a hundred features and still put a heavy frame around a quiet photograph. Another can be plain and get out of the way entirely. So each review is organised around what a platform shows best and what it flattens — the resize ceiling nobody mentions, the gallery block that crops your composition square, the checkout that takes a cut of the print you made.
Underneath the aesthetics we check the plumbing, because for most working creatives the site is not the product but the room the product is sold in: client galleries, proofing, print fulfilment, storage ceilings, and the fee taken on every sale.
Why there are no photographs here
This site ships no imagery at all. The frames you see are drawn in CSS. There are two reasons. The first is honesty: a review site about portfolios has no business dressing itself in stock photographs of somebody else's practice, and licensed filler would say nothing true about any platform. The second is speed. Image-heavy competitors are slow, and it would be a poor argument to lecture anyone about page weight from behind three megabytes of decoration.
Independence and sourcing
No platform pays for a score, a placement or a kinder sentence, and no vendor sees a review before it publishes. Prices and features are checked against vendor pages first and independent 2026 sources second. Where a vendor page was unreachable, mid-promotion or contradicted elsewhere, we mark the figure as unconfirmed and say which one it is rather than printing the tidier number.
We also do not invent measurements. Judgements here are assessments of documented capabilities and of what platforms actually publish, not stopwatch tests dressed up as laboratory results.
How the site pays for itself
Some outbound links to platforms are affiliate links, which means we may earn a commission if you subscribe. It never changes a score, and it costs you nothing. The affiliate disclosure sets out the arrangement in full. The plainest evidence that it does not buy anything: the platform paying the most generous commission is not the one at the top of the ranking, and the one we recommend most often for print sellers is the one we openly say we could not confirm a fee structure for.
Corrections and contact
Pricing moves and features quietly disappear. If a figure here is wrong, tell us and it gets fixed — corrections take priority over everything else in the inbox. Write to the curator via the contact page, and include a link to the page that shows the current number.